January 9, 2017
Benjamin Franklin would likely have been among the first Presidents of the United States were it not for his advanced age at the birth of the nation. Franklin is famous for the phrase, "...in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes," that he included in a letter in 1789. The phrase appears to have originated before Franklin, in 1716.
Science has given us a few certainties beyond death and taxes. We can be fairly certain that no chemical element will be discovered between hydrogen and helium. Some physical quantities are thought to be so immutable that we've elevated them to the status of constants, and their values are tabulated by the Task Group on Fundamental Constants of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology. The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) list 335 such constants on its web site.[1-2]
One of these constants is the speed of light in vacuum, symbolized by c, which has an exact value of 299,792,458 meters per second. The reason for the exactness of this value is that it's used to define the meter. In the past, the meter, a physical object kept at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures near Paris, was a constant, so the speed of light was derived from the meter. As technology advanced, we found it more appropriate to define the speed of light as a constant, and this was done in 1983. The second is defined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation from a certain electron transition in cesium-133.
In casual calculation, most physicists will use 300,000,000 meters/sec for the speed of light, since it's easy to remember, and it's just 0.07% larger than the actual value. The speed of light is so large that humans perceive its speed to be infinite. The ancient Greek philosophers Euclid and Ptolemy thought that the process of vision involved light emanating from the eyes and reflecting back to the observer. From this idea, Hero of Alexandria reasoned that the speed of light must be infinite, since we instantly see distant objects, such as stars, when we open our eyes.
The first experiment designed to measure the speed of light was performed by Galileo in 1638. The experiment was done using signal lanterns separated by a large distance, and he concluded that the speed was either very rapid or instantaneous. The round-trip transit time of light over a mile's distance is just 10.73 microseconds, which is too short an interval for humans to notice.
The Danish astronomer, Ole Rømer, was the first to give an actual value for the speed of light. In 1676, Rømer used the period of Jupiter's moon, Io, as a clock to find a value of 220,000,000 meters/sec, which is about 75% of the established value. A more accurate astronomical measurement was made in 1729 by English astronomer, James Bradley, who used his discovery of the aberration of light to calculate its speed to within 1.5% of its established value.
Does it really matter that the speed of light is very large but not infinite? life might not exist in a universe with an infinite speed of light. Life is the culmination of a long chain of non-equilibrium processes, and an infinite speed of light would force the universe into a very equilibrium state. This wouldn't be the gray goo of a runaway horde of self-replicating nanobots, but rather a hot white goo of undifferentiated nuclear matter.
While laboratory measurements have been giving us a fairly constant value for the speed of light, we've only been doing these for a very short span of time compared with the age of the universe. Could the speed of light have been different in the distant past? Measurements of the fine structure constant, a constant that's important to the stability of atoms, show that its rate of change, if it does change at all, is extremely small, of the order of (-1.6±2.3)x10-17 parts per year. The fine structure constant can be expressed in terms of other fundamental constants, including the speed of light.
A recent astronomical measurement of 120 ultra-compact radio sources gave an estimate of the speed of light when the universe was just 3.80 billion years old; that is, about ten billion years ago. That estimate, 2.995(±0.235)x105 km/s, is consistent with the laboratory value of 299,792,458 meter/second.
According to current theory, the universe that we see is the one that exists after a cosmic inflation, a period up to 10-32 seconds after the Big Bang in which the universe went through a stage of rapid expansion that produced its present isotropic structure. The early universe was a very energetic and strange place. Is there an alternative to inflation that gives us our present universe?
That was the question that Niayesh Afshordi of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) and João Magueijo of Imperial College (London, United Kingdom) addressed in a recent paper.[5-7] They propose an alternative to inflation based on an infinite speed of light in that early, energetic universe. An infinite speed of light at that time would allow evolution of the isotropic universe that we see today.
Papers on spacetime cosmology are mathematically dense (see figure), but the essential idea of the paper, that an initially infinite speed of light would "thermalize" the Big Bang to produce a homogeneous universe, is easy to understand. At infinite speed, radiation would reach into every portion of the universe and equalize any temperature differences.
Paper co-author, João Magueijo has being developing such variable speed of light theories for two decades as an alternative to inflation. Inflation as the reigning paradigm that explains of the origin of galaxies is deeply entrenched, and it will be hard to supplant without sufficient evidence. One aspect of Magueijo's theory is that light in the early universe propagated much faster than gravity.
Fortunately, this theory is testable. It predicts a specific pattern in the density variations of the early universe that leads to a particular value for a parameter called the spectral index. The predicted spectral index is 0.96478, which is close to the present measured value of 0.968, as derived from data of the cosmic microwave background radiation.[7-8]
- NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty, Fundamental Constants Data Center, NIST Physical Measurement Laboratory.
- Fundamental Physical Constants, Complete Listing, NIST (text file).
- T. Rosenband, D. B. Hume, P. O. Schmidt†, C. W. Chou, A. Brusch, L. Lorini, W. H. Oskay, R. E. Drullinger, T. M. Fortier, J. E. Stalnaker, S. A. Diddams, W. C. Swann, N. R. Newbury, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and J. C. Bergquist, "Frequency Ratio of Al+ and Hg+ Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place," Science, vol. 319, no.5871 (March 28, 2008), pp. 1808-1812, DOI: 10.1126/science.1154622.
- Shuo Cao, Marek Biesiada, John Jackson, Xiaogang Zheng, and Zong-Hong Zhu, "Measuring the speed of light with ultra-compact radio quasars," arXiv, September 28, 2016.
- Niayesh Afshordi, João Magueijo, "The critical geometry of a thermal big bang," Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, no. 10, Article No. 101301(R), Rapid Communication (November 18, 2016), DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.101301.
- Niayesh Afshordi, João Magueijo, "The critical geometry of a thermal big bang," arXiv version of ref. 5, November 8, 2016.
- Ian Sample, "Theory challenging Einstein's view on speed of light could soon be tested, The Guardian (UK), November 28, 2016.
- Akshat Rathi, "Physicists plan to test a new theory about the speed of light to explain what Einstein’s theory can't," Quartz, November 27, 2016.
- Joseph Dussault, "Einstein's speed of light theory tested: Did he get it wrong?" Christian Science Monitor, November 28, 2016.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Benjamin Franklin; Presidents of the United States; United States Declaration of Independence; birth of the nation; death and taxes (idiom); death; taxes; United States hundred-dollar bill; experiment; electricity; science; wave theory of light; Thomas Young (scientist); double-slit experiment; Wikimedia Commons; chemical element; hydrogen; helium; physical quantity; physical constant; Task Group on Fundamental Constants; Committee on Data for Science and Technology; US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); speed of light; vacuum; meters per second; meter; international prototype meter; International Bureau of Weights and Measures; Paris; second; frequency; period; cesium standard; hyperfine electron transition; cesium-133; calculation; physicist; long-term memory; remember; human; infinity; infinite; ancient Greek philosopher; Euclid; Ptolemy; visual perception; vision; light; eye; reflection; reflecting; Heron of Alexandria; Hero of Alexandria; star; Codex; Saint Gregory Nazianzenos; Greek language; manuscript; 9th century; Heron's formula; Hero's formula; Galileo Galilei; signal lantern; mile; microsecond; Denmark; Danish; astronomer; Ole Rømer; Jupiter; natural satellite; moon; Io; clock; astronomy; astronomical; English; James Bradley; aberration of light; life; universe; non-equilibrium thermodynamics; non-equilibrium process; thermal equilibrium; equilibrium state; gray goo; horde; self-replication; self-replicating; nanorobotics; nanobots; nuclear matter; laboratory; age of the universe; fine structure constant; atom; parts per year; fundamental constant; astronomical radio source; theory; cosmic inflation; Big Bang; isotropy; isotropic structure; energy; energetic; Niayesh Afshordi; Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada); João Magueijo; Imperial College (London, United Kingdom); scientific literature; paper; spacetime; cosmology; mathematics; mathematical; number density; dense; thermalize; homogeneous; temperature; phobia; physics; equation; power spectrum; co-author; decade; paradigm; galaxy; galaxies; propagation of light; gravitation; gravity; falsifiability; testable; density; parameter; spectral index; data; cosmic microwave background radiation; relict; average; kelvin; NASA; Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe; WMAP Science Team.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- J. Robert Oppenheimer and Black Holes - April 24, 2017
- Modeling Leaf Mass - April 20, 2017
- Easter, Chicks and Eggs - April 13, 2017
- You, Robot - April 10, 2017
- Collisions - April 6, 2017
- Eugene Garfield (1925-2017) - April 3, 2017
- Old Fossils - March 30, 2017
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008