Tikalon Blog is now in archive mode.
An easily printed and saved version of this article, and a link
to a directory of all articles, can be found below: |
This article |
Directory of all articles |
The 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics
October 6, 2011
Alfred Nobel was the inventor of
dynamite. His invention was transformative, since it allowed the safe and routine use of the powerful
explosive,
nitroglycerin. As a result, Nobel became a wealthy man, and his wealth funded the
Nobel Prizes.
The Nobel Prizes, which were endowed with the equivalent of about $250 million in today's money, were effectively Nobel's
sin offering for the unintended consequences of his life's work. His explosives were important for large
civil engineering projects, but they were also useful in weapons of war.
It's interesting that this year's
Nobel Prize in Physics, funded by explosives technology, relates to the
Big Bang theory of the Universe. The Big Bang theory (not to be confused with the eponymous
television series), posits that the universe began as an extremely compact state that expanded to the vast expanse that we now know.
This
universal expansion was derisively named the Big Bang by the prominent astronomer,
Fred Hoyle, a proponent of a "
steady state" cosmological model.[1] The name was embraced by even the proponents of the expansion theory, and the Big Bang was effectively proven by the
Penzias and
Wilson discovery of the
cosmic microwave background radiation.
Knowing that the universe is expanding leads to the further question of whether it will expand forever; or whether the expansion will slow, eventually coming back to a contraction symmetrically named, the
Big Crunch. To discover this observationally,
astronomers need to compare the expansion rate in the distant universe, which corresponds to times at the start of the expansion process, with the rate observed today. Such work resulted in the award of this year's Nobel Prize in Physics "for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae."[2-11]
The 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to
Saul Perlmutter of the
Supernova Cosmology Project at
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
Brian P. Schmidt of the
High-z Supernova Search Team at the
Australian National University, and
Adam G. Riess of the High-z Supernova Search Team at
Johns Hopkins University and the
Space Telescope Science Institute (Baltimore, MD). Perlmutter will get half of the $1.5-million monetary award, with the other half shared equally by Riess and Schmidt.[2] All three are Americans (Schmidt was born and raised in the United States, but he is also a citizen of Australia),[7] so the American physics hegemony is still intact, at least for the present.
Their observations involved a newer sort of "
standard candle" for
cosmology, the rare
type Ia supernova, the explosion of a
white dwarf that can emit as much light as an entire
galaxy. Type Ia supernova were found to be extremely uniform. Their
spectra match closely, as do their light curves, the change in brightness as a function of time after explosion. They could be used as a standard across the breadth of the universe.
Supernova 1994ae in NGC 3370. The left image is the discovery image, taken on Nov. 14, 1994. The right image is from the Hubble Space Telescope nine years later, long after the supernova had declined in brightness. (Image: NASA/A. Riess, STScI))
The research teams studying these found more than fifty of these distant supernovae and discovered that their light was weaker than expected. This indicated that the universal expansion was accelerating.[2] It's now thought that the expansion is driven by an enigmatic
dark energy that makes up about 73% of the Universe. The rest of the universe is composed of
dark matter (23%) and
visible matter (4%).[3]
The result was so unexpected that the scientists initially thought there was some error.[3] Schmidt, in teleconferences after the Nobel Prize was announced, said the following:
"It was with a fair bit of trepidation that we ended up telling our group and eventually telling the world that we had this crazy result."[10]
"It seemed too crazy to be right and I think we were a little scared."[9]
Observation of these type Ia supernovae was no mean feat. In a 2003 article, Saul Perlmutter listed these difficulties:[12]
• They are rare. There are only a few type Ia explosions per galaxy per millennium.
• They are random. There is no advance warning, and no way to schedule time on the few telescopes that are powerful enough for these observations.
• They are fleeting. After a star explodes into a type Ia supernova, it must be measured many times within the first few weeks. Otherwise, it will have passed its peak brightness, which is essential for calibration.
Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess are relatively young recipients of the physics prize. Perlmutter is 52, Schmidt is 44, and Riess is 41.[7]
William Lawrence Bragg, the youngest physics laureate, was just 25 at the time of his award;
Ray Davis, the oldest, was 88. The three shared the 2006
Shaw Prize in Astronomy,[3] and the
Peter Gruber Foundation 2007 Cosmology Prize.[4]
The path to the prize started for Perlmutter in 1988 when he became leader of the Supernova Cosmology Project. Years later, in 1994, Schmidt and Riess started working on the High-z Supernova Search Team.[5] Having two teams was beneficial, since they announced their results within a few weeks of each other, which added credence to the idea of accelerated expansion.[5]
On the occasion of the award,
Frank Wilczek, a 2004 Nobel Physics Laureate, had this to say,
"As far as fundamental significance for the foundations of physics and how we view the world, I think it's absolutely one of the major discoveries of the 20th century."[3]
References:
- Walter Sullivan, "Fred Hoyle Dies at 86; Opposed 'Big Bang' but Named It," The New York Times, August 22, 2001.
- Erik Huss and Annika Moberg, "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 - Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Adam G. Riess," The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Press Release, October 4, 2011.
- Amina Khan, "Physics 'error' leads to Nobel prize," Los Angeles Times, October 5, 2011.
- Maggie Fazeli Fard, "Local astrophysicist wins Nobel Prize in physics," Washington Post Blogs, October 4, 2011.
- Jason Palmer, "Nobel physics prize honours accelerating Universe find," BBC News, October 4, 2011.
- Nobel Physics Prize: Astronomers win for insights into expanding universe, Telegraph (UK), October 4, 2011.
- Dennis Overbye, "Studies of Universe's Expansion Win Physics Nobel," The New York Times, October 4, 2011.
- Lynn Neary and Richard Harris, "3 Astronomers Win Nobel Physics Prize," NPR Morning Edition, October 4, 2011.
- Patrick Lannin, Mia Shanley, Anna Ringstrom, Ben Hirschler and Alastair Macdonald, "Nobel Prize for physics: Universe expansion accelerating, not slowing down," Christian Science Monitor, October 4, 2011.
- Devin Powell, "Cosmic acceleration discovery wins physics Nobel," Science News, October 4, 2011.
- Alastair Good, "Universe like raisin bread says Nobel prize winner," Telegraph (UK), October 4, 2011.
- Perlmutter, S. Supernovae, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe, Physics Today, vol. 56, no. 4 (April, 2003), pp. 53-60.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Alfred Nobel; dynamite; explosive; nitroglycerin; Nobel Prize; sin offering; civil engineering; Nobel Prize in Physics; Big Bang theory; television series; universal expansion; Fred Hoyle; steady state theory; Arno Penzias; Robert Wilson; cosmic microwave background radiation; Big Crunch; astronomer; Saul Perlmutter; Supernova Cosmology Project; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Brian P. Schmidt; High-z Supernova Search Team; Australian National University; Adam G. Riess; Johns Hopkins University; Space Telescope Science Institute (Baltimore, MD); standard candle; cosmology; type Ia supernova; white dwarf; galaxy; spectra; NGC 3370; Hubble Space Telescope; dark energy; dark matter; visible matter; William Lawrence Bragg; Ray Davis; Shaw Prize in Astronomy; Peter Gruber Foundation 2007 Cosmology Prize; Frank Wilczek.